Breadcrumbs
Home ›
Building and energy
›
Building and construction
›
Building and construction consultations
›
Consultation document: Insulation requirements in housing and other buildings
›
2. Insulation in housing and small buildings
...
›
2.13. Topic 10: The look-up table with R-values for vertical windows and doors in housing misses some common glazing types
-
Consultation document: Insulation requirements in housing and other buildings
- 1. Introduction
-
2. Insulation in housing and small buildings
- 2.1. Background on energy efficiency for housing and small buildings
- 2.2. Optimising insulation to better balance upfront building costs and longer-term benefits
- 2.3. Topic 1: The schedule method may lead to higher upfront costs and less cost-effective construction than the more flexible calculation and modelling methods
- 2.4. Topic 2: The calculation method contains restrictions to the flexibility of roof, wall and floor R-values that can lead to unnecessarily costly and complex construction in some buildings
- 2.5. Topic 3: Where underfloor heating is only used in bathrooms, the minimum R-values for heated floors may cause unreasonable upfront costs
- 2.6. Consistency and certainty of compliance and consenting
- 2.7. Topic 4: The modelling method includes requirements that are unclear or outdated
- 2.8. Topic 5: Thermal bridging from framing in walls is not adequately considered
- 2.9. Topic 6: How the areas of roofs, walls and floors should be measured is unclear
- 2.10. Topic 7: NZS 4214 includes ambiguous instructions for determining the R-values of roofs, walls and some floors
- 2.11. Topic 8: For some mixed-use buildings it is unclear whether H1/AS1 and H1/VM1 can be used, or H1/AS2 and H1/VM2
- 2.12. Topic 9: The look-up tables with R-values for slab-on-ground floors do not cater for some common situations
- 2.13. Topic 10: The look-up table with R-values for vertical windows and doors in housing misses some common glazing types
- 2.14. Topic 11: Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 and Verification Method H1/VM1 include obsolete provisions and definitions, and outdated references to documents and tools
- 2.15. Summary of the proposals for housing and small buildings
- 2.16. Transition period for housing and small buildings
- 2.17. Effects of the H1 insulation requirements on overheating and dampness risks in new housing
-
3. Insulation in large buildings
- 3.1. Background on energy efficiency for large buildings
- 3.2. Optimising insulation to better balance upfront building costs and longer-term benefits
- 3.3. Topic 12: The schedule method may lead to less cost-effective construction than the more flexible calculation and modelling methods
- 3.4. Topic 13: The calculation method does not provide flexibility for roof, skylight and floor R-values, limiting opportunities for optimising insulation
- 3.5. Topic 14: Where underfloor heating is only used in bathrooms, the minimum R-values for heated floors may cause unreasonable upfront costs
- 3.6. Consistency and certainty of compliance and consenting
- 3.7. Topic 15: The modelling method includes requirements that are unclear or outdated
- 3.8. Topic 16: The schedule method does not adequately limit heat losses and gains from skylights in large buildings
- 3.9. Topic 17: Thermal bridging from framing in walls is not adequately considered
- 3.10. Topic 18: How the areas of roofs, walls and floors should be measured is unclear
- 3.11. Topic 19: NZS 4214 includes ambiguous instructions for determining the R-values of roofs, walls and some floors
- 3.12. Topic 20: For some mixed-use buildings it is unclear whether H1/AS1 and H1/VM1 can be used, or H1/AS2 and H1/VM2
- 3.13. Topic 21: The look-up tables with R-values for slab-on-ground floors do not cater for some common situations
- 3.14. Topic 22: Acceptable Solution H1/AS2 and Verification Method H1/VM2 include obsolete provisions and definitions, and outdated references to documents and tools
- 3.15. Summary of the proposals for large buildings
- 3.16. Transition period for large buildings H1/AS2 and H1/VM2
- 3.17. Transition period for large buildings H1/AS2 & H1/VM2
- Appendix A: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and bu
- Appendix B: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and buildings up to 300m squared
- Appendix C: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
- Appendix D: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
2.13. Topic 10: The look-up table with R-values for vertical windows and doors in housing misses some common glazing types
The look-up table with R-values for vertical windows and doors in housing misses some common glazing types
On this page
2.13.1. Reason for the change
With all compliance pathways for the H1 energy efficiency insulation provisions, designers need to determine the thermal resistance (R-value) of the proposed building elements that form part of a building’s thermal envelope. For vertical windows and doors in housing, an easy way for designers is to look up the R-value of common types of glazing from a Table E.1.1.1 in Appendix E of Acceptable Solution H1/AS1.
Industry feedback and recent BRANZ analysis suggest that the current table do not cover some common types of glazing with certain thermal performance characteristics. This can make it difficult for designers and Building Consent Authorities to establish whether a building complies with the H1 energy efficiency insulation provisions.
2.13.2. Proposed changes
The proposed changes involve amendments to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and buildings up to 300m2 to enable the use of the look-up table for vertical windows and doors in housing for more common types of glazing.
They include:
- Adding rows to Table E.1.1.1 in Appendix E of H1/AS1 for windows and doors that have double glazing units with Ug-values of 2.9, 1.2 and 1.0 W/(m2 K), and triple-glazing units with a Ug-value of
2.1 W/(m2 K) - Removing rows for uncommon double-glazing units with a Ug-value of 0.9 W/(m2 K), and triple glazing units with a Ug-value of 1.89 W/(m2 K).
For more details of the proposed wording in H1/AS1, please refer to Appendix A.
Appendix A: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 [PDF, 4.4 MB]
2.13.3. Questions for the consultation Topic 10
10-1. Do you support amending Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 as proposed to make it easier for designers and Building Consent Authorities to establish whether a building complies with the H1 energy efficiency insulation provisions by enabling the use of the look-up table for vertical windows and doors in housing for more common types of glazing?
- Yes, I support it.
- Yes, with changes.
- No, I don’t support it.
- Not sure/no preference.
10-2. Please explain your views.