Breadcrumbs
Home ›
Business and employment
›
Employment and skills
›
Employment legislation reviews
...
›
Accident compensation dispute resolution review
-
Employment and skills
- Employment Action Plan
- Employment Strategy 2019
- Fair Pay Agreements legislation
- Health and safety
-
Employment legislation reviews
- Employment Relations Act 2000 amendments
- Holidays Act reform
- Increasing the minimum sick leave entitlement
- Workplace relations in the screen industry
- Forced Labour Protocol
- Extending paid parental leave
- Equal Pay Amendment Act
- Law change for Easter Sunday shop trading
- Employment Standards Legislation Act
- Proposed Accident Compensation Appeal Tribunal
- Accident compensation dispute resolution review
- Reviewing regulated ACC payments for treatment
- Employment Relations Amendment Act
- Minimum wage reviews
- Sex work in New Zealand
- Changes to the process for setting pay for Members of Parliament
- Security officers – additional employment protections
- Matariki
- Updating Accident Compensation Review Costs Regulations
- Queen Elizabeth II Memorial Day
- Changes to ACC’s Accredited Employers Programme
- Review framework for list of occupational diseases
- Contractor work in Aotearoa New Zealand
- Support workers – request for additional employment protections
- Changes to ACC regulations for Chinese medicine, paramedics and audiometrists
- Accident Compensation (Interest on Instalments) Amendment Act
- Our international labour relations
- Labour market reports, data and analysis
- Future of Work Tripartite Forum
- NZ income insurance scheme
- NZ Industrial Relations Foundation
- Plan of action against forced labour, people trafficking and slavery
- Employment website
- Regional Skills Leadership Groups
Accident compensation dispute resolution review
This page provides information about the implementation of recommendations from the 2015 independent review into accident compensation dispute resolution processes.
On this page
In 2015, advocacy group Acclaim Otago released a report into accident compensation dispute resolution processes. It identified 4 issues (being heard, access to the law, access to evidence and access to representation) as the “likely causes of current inefficiencies in the dispute resolution system."
Following this, at the request of the ACC Minister, we commissioned Miriam R Dean CNZM QC to undertake an Independent Review. Her report found that some (though not all) of the concerns raised by Acclaim were valid and recommended a number of possible improvements to existing practice.
In 2016, Cabinet accepted all the recommendations contained in the Independent Review. Since then MBIE, ACC and Fairway Resolution Services have undertaken considerable work to support customers’ access to justice. We are confident that the changes made have improved customers’ access to justice and provided them with greater support and more transparency when they want to challenge an ACC decision.
In December 2018, we provided a progress update to the ACC Minister on our progress implementing the recommendations. This report provides transparency about the work agencies have done in response to the review. It does not signal an end to work being done to improve the dispute resolution process. This is an on-going commitment for ACC.
ACC and MBIE Briefing Paper: Appendices A, B and C [PDF, 603 KB]
Background documents
The Independent Review
The Independent Review’s report recognised the considerable work that both ACC and FairWay had already done to improve the dispute resolution system.
Cabinet response to the review
In 2016, Cabinet decided all recommendations contained in the Independent Review report on ACC dispute resolution processes would be addressed.
Appendices 2, 3 and 4 [PDF, 875 KB]
Recommendation 6 was amended after the Cabinet Paper was submitted. The amended recommendation reads:
Amended recommendation 6 for tabling in Response to the Independent Review of Acclaim Otago’s report into Accident Compensation Dispute Resolution Processes
6. Note that the Minister for ACC will report back to Cabinet by March 2017 with advice on the progress of all the proposals listed in Appendix 2 including:
6.1 the proposal to increase funding for existing free advocacy services for accident compensation claimants,
6.2 the proposal to fund a free nationwide advocacy service modelled broadly on the Health and Disability Commission Advocacy Service, and
6.3 any implications for ACC levies and appropriations arising from the implementation of the review recommendations as listed in Appendix 2.