Addressing the interface between the building and resource consent system

Chapter 9 noted that reform of the resource management system could help reduce the occurrence of unnecessary overlaps between the 2 consent processes, while promotion of the use of project information memorandums could also help applicants navigate the 2 processes.

Submitters were asked what other options should be considered to address issues arising from the overlaps between the building and resource consent processes.

193 submitters answered this question.

26 submissions supported encouraging the uptake of project information memorandums, with just under half of these suggesting they should it be mandatory to apply for a project information memorandum before applying for a building consent.

27 submitters suggested it should be a requirement for resource consent to be obtained or applied for before building consent.

55 submitters suggested options that would reduce the need to supply duplicate information for both consent processes. Common suggestions included:

• training resource consent and building consent processing teams to be familiar with both consents and their requirements
• enabling council departments to share information between resource consent and building consent applications
• developing a user-friendly online portal that manages both resource consents and building consents; the portal could automatically collate and distribute application information to the appropriate teams.

25 submitters suggested that applying for a resource consent and building consent should be a single process, managed by a single team within councils.

While some submitters suggested combining both regulatory systems into a single framework or piece of legislation, there was much greater support for keeping the processes distinct and separate. Those that favoured keeping the processes distinct suggested that issues relating to the overlap could be addressed through education and guidance to building owners, the industry and territorial authorities.

Some submitters suggested MBIE carry out a formal review to assess overlaps and areas of potential consolidation between the Resource Management Act, the Building Act and other legislation. However, a similar number suggested waiting until reforms of the resource management system have been completed, before making any further changes.

20 submissions stressed the importance of needing to manage natural hazards at the planning stage and the need to resolve the differences in how natural hazards are treated between resource consents and building consents.

< Better responding to the needs and aspirations of Māori | Submitter details >