Breadcrumbs
Home ›
Building and energy
›
Building and construction
›
Building and construction consultations
›
Proposed amendments to the BuiltReady Scheme Rules public consultation
...
›
Discussion: the proposed BuiltReady scheme rules
-
Building and construction consultations
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Minister's foreword
- Executive summary
- Introduction
- Current risk requirements
- Problem definition
- Options for working with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
- Closing remarks
- Summary of all consultation questions
- Glossary
- Annex I: Silicosis and engineered stone background
- Annex II: Overview of the health and safety regulatory regime
- Annex III: Revised Workplace Exposure Standard
- Annex IV: Further information on the status quo
- Annex V: Australia’s amendments to its regulatory settings in response to the risks posed by RCS
- Making it easier to build granny flats (2024)
- Building Code fire safety review discussion document
- Review of the building consent system (snapshot)
- Proposed amendments to the BuiltReady Scheme Rules public consultation
-
Building consent system review: Options paper summary of submissions
- Introduction
- Key themes from submissions
- Promoting competition in the building regulatory system
- Removing impediments to product substitution and variation
- Strengthening roles and responsibilities
- New assurance pathways
- More efficient and streamlined delivery of building consent services
- Better performance monitoring and system stewardship
- Better responding to the needs and aspirations of Māori
- Addressing the interface between the building and resource consent system
- Submitter details
-
Improving efficiency in the inspection process: Discussion document
- Use of information
- Minister's foreword
- Introduction
- Increasing the uptake of remote inspections
- Section one: Options to increase the uptake of remote inspections and improve efficiency of inspection processes
- Section two: Increasing inspection capacity through the use of Accredited Organisations (Building)
- Appendix one: Full list of consultation questions
- Appendix two: Summary of options for feedback
-
Consultation document: Insulation requirements in housing and other buildings
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Insulation in housing and small buildings
- 3. Insulation in large buildings
- Appendix A: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and bu
- Appendix B: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM1 Energy Efficiency for all housing, and buildings up to 300m squared
- Appendix C: Proposed changes to Acceptable Solution H1/AS2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
- Appendix D: Proposed changes to Verification Method H1/VM2 Energy Efficiency for buildings greater than 300m squared
-
Work with engineered stone and materials containing crystalline silica
Discussion: the proposed BuiltReady scheme rules
On this page
This part of the consultation discusses the draft of the proposed amendments to the BuiltReady scheme rules, which is available at:
Seeking your feedback on proposals for BuiltReady scheme rules
Part 2: Accreditation body requirements
MBIE is proposing 1 new scheme rule for the accreditation body:
1. Using the BuiltReady brand
The proposed scheme rule specifies that the accreditation body may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they follow the format and conditions of use provided for in the Schedule 1 of the scheme rules.
Questions:
1. Do you agree with the proposed rule that the accreditation body may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they do so in accordance with Schedule 1?
2. Do you think there are there any barriers to following this rule?
Part 4: MCM certification body requirements
Part 4 of the BuiltReady scheme rules covers the ongoing, detailed requirements that a certification body must continue to meet and maintain once accredited.
MBIE is proposing 1 new scheme rule for the modular component manufacturer (MCM0 certification body:
1. Using the BuiltReady brand
The proposed scheme rule specifies that the MCM certification body may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they follow the format and conditions of use provided for in Schedule 1 of the scheme rules.
Questions:
3. Do you agree with the proposed rule that the MCM certification body may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they do so in accordance with Schedule 1?
4. Do you think there are any barriers to following this rule?
Part 6: Certified modular component manufacturer requirements
The proposed rules in this section detail the manufacturer’s ongoing requirements once certified.
1. Mandating use of MBIE’s current manufacturer certificate template
The proposed rule to mandate the use of MBIE’s provided manufacturer certificate template is to ensure consistency of BuiltReady manufacturer certificates across the country, both for trust in the BuiltReady scheme and ease of use in consenting decisions.
In addition to using MBIE’s current manufacturer certificate template, modular component manufacturers must not change the structure and the design of the certificates.
Questions:
5. Do you agree with the proposed rule to mandate the use of MBIE’s provided manufacturer certificate template?
6. Is the proposed rule to mandate the use of MBIE’s current manufacturer certificate template clear and workable? If not, what changes would you suggest?
1. Using the BuiltReady brand
With the proposed rule around use of the BuiltReady brand, the modular component manufacturer may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they follow the format and conditions of use provided for in Schedule 1 of the scheme rules.
Schedule 1 also contains additional requirements for modular component manufacturers. A proposed rule specifies that if a modular component manufacturer uses the BuiltReady brand, they must state the scope of certification and not use the BuiltReady brand for advertising other services beyond the scope of certification.
Questions:
7. Do you agree with the proposed rule that a modular component manufacturer may use the BuiltReady brand, provided they do so in accordance with Schedule 1?
8. Is the proposed rule to require modular component manufacturers to state their scope of certification while using the BuiltReady brand, as well as only using the BuiltReady brand in relation to services they offer under their scope of certification, clear and workable?
9. Do you think there are any barriers to following this rule?